"BUT if someone starts posting or selling anothers work who never intended to do so themselves, they've actually lost nothing, even though the 'infringer' has benefited from work they did not create."
Yeaaah she thinks it's okay if the original artist wasn't actively using it to make money off of in the first place. Like they've somehow lost their right to use their own art. Which I guess means it's okay for large companies to do this as well. I'm just flabbergasted, really.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2010-06-22 07:30 am (UTC)Yeaaah she thinks it's okay if the original artist wasn't actively using it to make money off of in the first place. Like they've somehow lost their right to use their own art. Which I guess means it's okay for large companies to do this as well. I'm just flabbergasted, really.