So because I won't get into a e-penis waving contest with you that makes you right be default? No, child. It simply means that without evidence claims don't prove anything and as I said, being well read and actually understanding what you've read are not the same thing.
No child, it simply means that a set of licensing laws whereby government licensed people's own work to them isn't the same as a copyright law which simply asserts that your stuff is your stuff. A licensing law is not a copyright law, ergo copyright law did not exist until the first law was created that was roughly analogous to the term copyright.
Again, just because you make a claim doesn't make it true, fact is you are woefully uninformed, lacking in social graces or perception and worse ignorant to both those issues.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2010-06-23 04:46 am (UTC)So because I won't get into a e-penis waving contest with you that makes you right be default? No, child. It simply means that without evidence claims don't prove anything and as I said, being well read and actually understanding what you've read are not the same thing.
No child, it simply means that a set of licensing laws whereby government licensed people's own work to them isn't the same as a copyright law which simply asserts that your stuff is your stuff. A licensing law is not a copyright law, ergo copyright law did not exist until the first law was created that was roughly analogous to the term copyright.
Again, just because you make a claim doesn't make it true, fact is you are woefully uninformed, lacking in social graces or perception and worse ignorant to both those issues.