I see. That's odd, but I mean...it's always things you really need that seem to be the least accessible, so I guess it's not really surprising.
However, I never said you were defending them, I even said I pretty much agree with you, but I feel like your situation has different context. It's not that I'm saying schedule conflicts can't happen, I'm saying that I can't imagine it actually being a problem for this specific person who voluntarily chose to sell physical items, and then went on to claim she shipped it once before.
Like if this really was that much of a problem for her, how was she able to ship it before as she claimed? If she didn't and only said she had, she was lying then. If she did and it really got lost in the mail, then she in fact *can* make it to the post office. So not only are her excuses not acceptable, but it feels like she made them up to begin with. So I'm having a hard time believing specifically her. Does that make sense?
no subject
Date: 2016-06-19 10:07 pm (UTC)However, I never said you were defending them, I even said I pretty much agree with you, but I feel like your situation has different context. It's not that I'm saying schedule conflicts can't happen, I'm saying that I can't imagine it actually being a problem for this specific person who voluntarily chose to sell physical items, and then went on to claim she shipped it once before.
Like if this really was that much of a problem for her, how was she able to ship it before as she claimed? If she didn't and only said she had, she was lying then. If she did and it really got lost in the mail, then she in fact *can* make it to the post office. So not only are her excuses not acceptable, but it feels like she made them up to begin with. So I'm having a hard time believing specifically her. Does that make sense?